JUDGEMENT OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI IN THE CASE TITLED “RAJBHUSHAN OMPRAKASH DIXIT VS. UNION OF INDIA & ANR, (2018) 02 DEL CK 0482” CONCERNING OFFENCES UNDER PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT
NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET KUMAR 8383098478 , 9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 , 9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com ASHOK MISHRA 9718327746 sales@courtkutchehry.com RAVI KUMAR ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com Rajbhushan Omprakash Dixit vs. Union Of India & Anr, (2018) 02 DEL CK 0482 PARA NO. 6 & 30 6. There was a debate in the Lok Sabha on Section 45 PMLA and the proposed amendment. In his reply, the Finance Minister again clarified, as under: “Sir, first to answer Mr. Sudhakar Reddy, Section 45(1)(a) is being omitted because, if the offence is cognizable, then any police officer in this country can arrest without a warrant. Section 19 says, only the Director or Assistant Director should investigate the offence. There is a conflict. Therefore, we are making it non-cognizable. But, investigation will be ...